Return Multiple Values From Functions, using Arrays: In PHP

Return Multiple Values From Function Using Arrays In PHP

If you are a C/C++ programmer, then you know that functions can not return more than one value. To over come this, they use Call by Reference – where address of the variables is passed, hence whenever the value in the passed address changes, the value of the actual variable changes without anything being returned.

In PHP we can accomplish this with the help of arrays.

Video Tutorial: Return Multiple Values From Function Using Arrays In PHP

Work Flow: Logic

Step 1: Here we pass the values to the function.

Step 2: Calculation or operation takes place inside the function.

Step 3: In case there are multiple things to return, we store it inside a array variable. Ex: $result = array($add, $sub, $mul, $div);

Step 4: We return the array variable.

Step 5: Now using array index we display the individual result using echo or print statement.

Source Code: Return Multiple Values From Function Using Arrays In PHP

  Subtration :".$get_result[1]. "
Multiplication: ".$get_result[2]." 
Division: ".$get_result[3]; echo "

"; print_r ($get_result); ?> ?>  

Output:
Addition: 30
Subtration :10
Multiplication: 200
Division: 2

Array ( [0] => 30 [1] => 10 [2] => 200 [3] => 2 )

Things To Remember:

1. All PHP files must have .php file extension.

2. Concatination operator in PHP is . [DOT]

3. print_r is a function which takes array variable as its argument and displays the input array structure. Ex: print_r ($get_result);

4. Function is defined in php using the keyword function, followed by function name.

5. $ is used to declare variables in PHP.

Array Syntax In PHP:
$variable = array(arrayElements);

For Numbers: Ex: $num = array(20, 40, 50, 60, 100);
For Strings: Ex: $str = array(“Microsoft”,”Apple”,”Oracle”,”Google”);
For Character: Ex: $chr = array(‘A’,’E’,’I’,’O’,’U’);

array is a keyword for declaring/initializing arrays in PHP.

Источник

Php use array from function

// Before php 5.4
$array = array(1,2,3);

// since php 5.4 , short syntax
$array = [1,2,3];

// I recommend using the short syntax if you have php version >= 5.4

Used to creating arrays like this in Perl?

Looks like we need the range() function in PHP:

$array = array_merge (array( ‘All’ ), range ( ‘A’ , ‘Z’ ));
?>

You don’t need to array_merge if it’s just one range:

There is another kind of array (php>= 5.3.0) produced by

$array = new SplFixedArray(5);

Standard arrays, as documented here, are marvellously flexible and, due to the underlying hashtable, extremely fast for certain kinds of lookup operation.

Supposing a large string-keyed array

$arr=[‘string1’=>$data1, ‘string2’=>$data2 etc. ]

when getting the keyed data with

php does *not* have to search through the array comparing each key string to the given key (‘string1’) one by one, which could take a long time with a large array. Instead the hashtable means that php takes the given key string and computes from it the memory location of the keyed data, and then instantly retrieves the data. Marvellous! And so quick. And no need to know anything about hashtables as it’s all hidden away.

However, there is a lot of overhead in that. It uses lots of memory, as hashtables tend to (also nearly doubling on a 64bit server), and should be significantly slower for integer keyed arrays than old-fashioned (non-hashtable) integer-keyed arrays. For that see more on SplFixedArray :

Unlike a standard php (hashtabled) array, if you lookup by integer then the integer itself denotes the memory location of the data, no hashtable computation on the integer key needed. This is much quicker. It’s also quicker to build the array compared to the complex operations needed for hashtables. And it uses a lot less memory as there is no hashtable data structure. This is really an optimisation decision, but in some cases of large integer keyed arrays it may significantly reduce server memory and increase performance (including the avoiding of expensive memory deallocation of hashtable arrays at the exiting of the script).

When creating arrays , if we have an element with the same value as another element from the same array, we would expect PHP instead of creating new zval container to increase the refcount and point the duplicate symbol to the same zval. This is true except for value type integer.
Example:

$arr = [‘bebe’ => ‘Bob’, ‘age’ => 23, ‘too’ => 23 ];
xdebug_debug_zval( ‘arr’ );

(refcount=2, is_ref=0)
array (size=3)
‘bebe’ => (refcount=1, is_ref=0)string ‘Bob’ (length=3)
‘age’ => (refcount=0, is_ref=0)int 23
‘too’ => (refcount=0, is_ref=0)int 23

but :
$arr = [‘bebe’ => ‘Bob’, ‘age’ => 23, ‘too’ => ’23’ ];
xdebug_debug_zval( ‘arr’ );

(refcount=2, is_ref=0)
array (size=3)
‘bebe’ => (refcount=1, is_ref=0)string ‘Bob’ (length=3)
‘age’ => (refcount=0, is_ref=0)int 23
‘too’ => (refcount=1, is_ref=0)string ’23’ (length=2)
or :

$arr = [‘bebe’ => ‘Bob’, ‘age’ => [1,2], ‘too’ => [1,2] ];
xdebug_debug_zval( ‘arr’ );

(refcount=2, is_ref=0)
array (size=3)
‘bebe’ => (refcount=1, is_ref=0)string ‘Bob’ (length=3)
‘age’ => (refcount=2, is_ref=0)
array (size=2)
0 => (refcount=0, is_ref=0)int 1
1 => (refcount=0, is_ref=0)int 2
‘too’ => (refcount=2, is_ref=0)
array (size=2)
0 => (refcount=0, is_ref=0)int 1
1 => (refcount=0, is_ref=0)int 2

This function makes (assoc.) array creation much easier:

function arr (. $array )< return $array ; >
?>

It allows for short syntax like:

$arr = arr ( x : 1 , y : 2 , z : 3 );
?>

Instead of:

$arr = [ «x» => 1 , «y» => 2 , «z» => 3 ];
// or
$arr2 = array( «x» => 1 , «y» => 2 , «z» => 3 );
?>

Sadly PHP 8.2 doesn’t support this named arguments in the «array» function/language construct.

Источник

Php use array from function

// Before php 5.4
$array = array(1,2,3);

// since php 5.4 , short syntax
$array = [1,2,3];

// I recommend using the short syntax if you have php version >= 5.4

Used to creating arrays like this in Perl?

Looks like we need the range() function in PHP:

$array = array_merge (array( ‘All’ ), range ( ‘A’ , ‘Z’ ));
?>

You don’t need to array_merge if it’s just one range:

There is another kind of array (php>= 5.3.0) produced by

$array = new SplFixedArray(5);

Standard arrays, as documented here, are marvellously flexible and, due to the underlying hashtable, extremely fast for certain kinds of lookup operation.

Supposing a large string-keyed array

$arr=[‘string1’=>$data1, ‘string2’=>$data2 etc. ]

when getting the keyed data with

php does *not* have to search through the array comparing each key string to the given key (‘string1’) one by one, which could take a long time with a large array. Instead the hashtable means that php takes the given key string and computes from it the memory location of the keyed data, and then instantly retrieves the data. Marvellous! And so quick. And no need to know anything about hashtables as it’s all hidden away.

However, there is a lot of overhead in that. It uses lots of memory, as hashtables tend to (also nearly doubling on a 64bit server), and should be significantly slower for integer keyed arrays than old-fashioned (non-hashtable) integer-keyed arrays. For that see more on SplFixedArray :

Unlike a standard php (hashtabled) array, if you lookup by integer then the integer itself denotes the memory location of the data, no hashtable computation on the integer key needed. This is much quicker. It’s also quicker to build the array compared to the complex operations needed for hashtables. And it uses a lot less memory as there is no hashtable data structure. This is really an optimisation decision, but in some cases of large integer keyed arrays it may significantly reduce server memory and increase performance (including the avoiding of expensive memory deallocation of hashtable arrays at the exiting of the script).

When creating arrays , if we have an element with the same value as another element from the same array, we would expect PHP instead of creating new zval container to increase the refcount and point the duplicate symbol to the same zval. This is true except for value type integer.
Example:

$arr = [‘bebe’ => ‘Bob’, ‘age’ => 23, ‘too’ => 23 ];
xdebug_debug_zval( ‘arr’ );

(refcount=2, is_ref=0)
array (size=3)
‘bebe’ => (refcount=1, is_ref=0)string ‘Bob’ (length=3)
‘age’ => (refcount=0, is_ref=0)int 23
‘too’ => (refcount=0, is_ref=0)int 23

but :
$arr = [‘bebe’ => ‘Bob’, ‘age’ => 23, ‘too’ => ’23’ ];
xdebug_debug_zval( ‘arr’ );

(refcount=2, is_ref=0)
array (size=3)
‘bebe’ => (refcount=1, is_ref=0)string ‘Bob’ (length=3)
‘age’ => (refcount=0, is_ref=0)int 23
‘too’ => (refcount=1, is_ref=0)string ’23’ (length=2)
or :

$arr = [‘bebe’ => ‘Bob’, ‘age’ => [1,2], ‘too’ => [1,2] ];
xdebug_debug_zval( ‘arr’ );

(refcount=2, is_ref=0)
array (size=3)
‘bebe’ => (refcount=1, is_ref=0)string ‘Bob’ (length=3)
‘age’ => (refcount=2, is_ref=0)
array (size=2)
0 => (refcount=0, is_ref=0)int 1
1 => (refcount=0, is_ref=0)int 2
‘too’ => (refcount=2, is_ref=0)
array (size=2)
0 => (refcount=0, is_ref=0)int 1
1 => (refcount=0, is_ref=0)int 2

This function makes (assoc.) array creation much easier:

function arr (. $array )< return $array ; >
?>

It allows for short syntax like:

$arr = arr ( x : 1 , y : 2 , z : 3 );
?>

Instead of:

$arr = [ «x» => 1 , «y» => 2 , «z» => 3 ];
// or
$arr2 = array( «x» => 1 , «y» => 2 , «z» => 3 );
?>

Sadly PHP 8.2 doesn’t support this named arguments in the «array» function/language construct.

Источник

Php use array from function

To experiment on performance of pass-by-reference and pass-by-value, I used this script. Conclusions are below.

#!/usr/bin/php
function sum ( $array , $max ) < //For Reference, use: "&$array"
$sum = 0 ;
for ( $i = 0 ; $i < 2 ; $i ++)#$array[$i]++; //Uncomment this line to modify the array within the function.
$sum += $array [ $i ];
>
return ( $sum );
>

$max = 1E7 //10 M data points.
$data = range ( 0 , $max , 1 );

$start = microtime ( true );
for ( $x = 0 ; $x < 100 ; $x ++)$sum = sum ( $data , $max );
>
$end = microtime ( true );
echo «Time: » .( $end — $start ). » s\n» ;

/* Run times:
# PASS BY MODIFIED? Time
— ——- ——— —-
1 value no 56 us
2 reference no 58 us

3 valuue yes 129 s
4 reference yes 66 us

1. PHP is already smart about zero-copy / copy-on-write. A function call does NOT copy the data unless it needs to; the data is
only copied on write. That’s why #1 and #2 take similar times, whereas #3 takes 2 million times longer than #4.
[You never need to use &$array to ask the compiler to do a zero-copy optimisation; it can work that out for itself.]

2. You do use &$array to tell the compiler «it is OK for the function to over-write my argument in place, I don’t need the original
any more.» This can make a huge difference to performance when we have large amounts of memory to copy.
(This is the only way it is done in C, arrays are always passed as pointers)

3. The other use of & is as a way to specify where data should be *returned*. (e.g. as used by exec() ).
(This is a C-like way of passing pointers for outputs, whereas PHP functions normally return complex types, or multiple answers
in an array)

5. Sometimes, pass by reference could be at the choice of the caller, NOT the function definitition. PHP doesn’t allow it, but it
would be meaningful for the caller to decide to pass data in as a reference. i.e. «I’m done with the variable, it’s OK to stomp
on it in memory».
*/
?>

Источник